Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 8 de 8
Filtrar
1.
J Infect Dis ; 2023 Dec 22.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38133639

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) fusion protein stabilized in the prefusion conformation (RSVPreF3) was under investigation as a maternal vaccine. METHODS: This phase 2, randomized, placebo-controlled, single-dose, multicenter study enrolled healthy, non-pregnant women, randomized 1:1:1:1:1 to five parallel groups studying RSVPreF3 (60 or 120 µg) co-administered with diphtheria, tetanus, and acellular pertussis vaccine (dTpa) or placebo, and dTpa co-administered with placebo. Safety and humoral immune responses were assessed. An extension phase also assessed a RSVPreF3 120 µg vaccination 12-18 months post-first vaccination. RESULTS: The safety profile of RSVPreF3 was unaffected by dose or dTpa co-administration. Solicited and unsolicited adverse events (AEs) were evenly distributed across study groups. Injection-site pain was higher following the second vaccination vs the first vaccination. Medically attended AEs were rare (<5% overall). Both RSVPreF3 dose levels (alone and with dTpa) were immunogenic, increasing levels of RSV-A neutralizing antibody ≥8 fold and anti-RSVPreF3 IgG antibody ≥11 fold at 1 month post-vaccination, which persisted at 12-18 months post-vaccination; modest 2-fold increases were observed with a second RSVPreF3 vaccination. CONCLUSIONS: This study indicates RSVPreF3 co-administration with dTpa induces robust immune responses and is well tolerated, regardless of the RSVPreF3 dose level used. CLINICAL TRIALS REGISTRATION: NCT04138056.

2.
Hum Vaccin Immunother ; 19(1): 2159731, 2023 12 31.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36746754

RESUMO

Patients with obstructive airway diseases (OAD), like chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and asthma, may be at increased risk of pertussis infection. Pertussis may also trigger COPD and asthma exacerbations. Vaccination against pertussis could help protect OAD patients from the additional burden of pertussis, but there may be hesitancy related to vaccine safety and immunogenicity in such patients. We performed a meta-analysis on 5 clinical trials in adults receiving reduced-antigen tetanus-diphtheria-acellular pertussis vaccine (Tdap, Boostrix, GSK), from which we selected participants on active OAD treatment. We compared immunogenicity and reactogenicity outcomes of the meta-analysis with data from the overall populations of Tdap-vaccinated adults from 6 Tdap trials (including the 5 in the meta-analysis). The meta-analysis comprised 222 adults on active standard OAD treatment. One month post-Tdap, 89.0% and 97.2% of these adults, respectively, achieved seroprotective anti-diphtheria and anti-tetanus antibody concentrations; 78.3%-96.1% showed booster responses across the 3 pertussis antigens. These rates were consistent with those in the comparator population. The most frequently reported solicited local and systemic adverse events within 4 days post-Tdap were injection site pain (47.7%) and fatigue (19.3%), with low rates of grade 3 intensity (0.9% and 2.8%). This was consistent with Tdap reactogenicity in the comparator population. Evaluation of unsolicited and serious adverse events within 1 month post-Tdap did not identify safety concerns. In conclusion, Tdap was immunogenic and well tolerated in adults under active standard OAD treatment, with immunogenicity and safety profiles consistent with those in a comparator population representing the general adult population.


Whooping cough is a very contagious respiratory disease that is most dangerous for young babies but can affect people of all ages. People with chronic lung diseases like asthma or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) may be more likely to get ill and suffer from complications from whooping cough. Vaccination against whooping cough is an important way to help protect these people. However, some doctors may hesitate to vaccinate patients because they may worry that vaccination could worsen asthma or COPD symptoms or that drugs taken by these patients could make vaccines work less well. We therefore looked at the immunogenicity and safety of a whooping cough vaccine (Boostrix, GSK) in adults treated for chronic lung diseases like asthma or COPD. We analyzed data from 5 previous clinical studies and specifically selected data from patients taking standard medication for chronic lung diseases in these studies. We found that the immune response to whooping cough vaccination in these patients was comparable to that in a comparator group representative of the general adult population receiving Boostrix. The vaccine was as well tolerated in patients with chronic lung diseases as in the general adult population. Our results suggest that the whooping cough vaccine Boostrix can be safely given to adults taking standard medication for chronic lung diseases to help prevent severe illness and complications from whooping cough.


Assuntos
Asma , Vacinas contra Difteria, Tétano e Coqueluche Acelular , Difteria , Doença Pulmonar Obstrutiva Crônica , Tétano , Coqueluche , Adulto , Humanos , Coqueluche/prevenção & controle , Imunização Secundária , Difteria/prevenção & controle , Tétano/prevenção & controle , Vacinação , Vacinas Bacterianas , Anticorpos Antibacterianos
3.
COPD ; 18(3): 341-348, 2021 06.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33955798

RESUMO

Pertussis is underdiagnosed and underreported in adults and patients with underlying conditions. Patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) may be at increased risk of severe pertussis. Understanding the true prevalence of pertussis infections in such patients is important. We therefore evaluated the seroprevalence of anti-pertussis toxin (PT) antibodies in a cohort of 40-85-year-old patients diagnosed with moderate, severe or very severe COPD enrolled (between June 2011 and June 2012) in the prospective, observational "Acute Exacerbation and Respiratory InfectionS in COPD" (AERIS; NCT01360398) study, conducted in England. Serum anti-PT antibodies were measured in 104 patients using an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay on samples collected 12 months (M12) and 24 months (M24) after enrollment. Overall, 14/104 (13.5%) patients had anti-PT concentrations ≥50 IU/mL at M12 or M24, indicative of exposure to Bordetella pertussis during the preceding 2-3 years. Of these, 6/104 (5.8%) had anti-PT ≥70 IU/mL, of whom 3/104 (2.9%) had anti-PT ≥120 IU/mL, indicative of exposure within 12 and 6 months, respectively. These results show a high circulation of B. pertussis in 40-85-year-old patients with moderate, severe or very severe COPD in England between 2012 and 2014, and call for enhanced immunization to prevent pertussis infections in such patients.


Assuntos
Doença Pulmonar Obstrutiva Crônica , Coqueluche , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Anticorpos Antibacterianos , Bordetella pertussis , Inglaterra/epidemiologia , Humanos , Imunoglobulina G , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Prospectivos , Doença Pulmonar Obstrutiva Crônica/epidemiologia , Estudos Soroepidemiológicos , Coqueluche/epidemiologia
4.
Hum Vaccin Immunother ; 17(3): 723-730, 2021 03 04.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32845735

RESUMO

As vaccine-induced immunity and protection following natural pertussis infection wane over time, adults and adolescents may develop pertussis and become transmitters to unprotected infants. In Russia, diphtheria and tetanus but not pertussis-containing vaccines are registered for older children, adolescents, or adults. The reduced-antigen-content diphtheria toxoid, tetanus toxoid, and acellular pertussis (dTpa) vaccine (Boostrix, GSK) was developed for booster vaccination of children ≥4 years of age, adolescents, and adults. A phase III, open-label, non-randomized study was performed in eight centers in Russia between January and July 2018. The objective of this study was to assess immunogenicity, reactogenicity and safety of a single dose of dTpa vaccine in healthy Russian participants ≥4 years of age (age categories 4-9 years, 10-17 years, 18-64 years, and ≥65 years). At 1 month post-booster vaccination, across all age groups, >99.0% of participants were seroprotected against diphtheria and tetanus and >96.0% of participants were seropositive for anti-pertussis antibodies. For all antibodies across all age groups, antibody GMCs increased from pre- to 1 month post-booster vaccination and booster responses to diphtheria (in 71.5% of participants), tetanus (85.3%), and pertussis antigens (≥85.6%) were observed. One serious adverse event that was not causally related to the study vaccine was reported. No fatal cases were reported throughout the study period. In conclusion, administration of the dTpa vaccine as a booster dose in healthy Russian participants induced a robust immune response to all vaccine antigens and was generally well tolerated across all age groups.


Assuntos
Vacinas contra Difteria, Tétano e Coqueluche Acelular , Difteria , Coqueluche , Adolescente , Adulto , Anticorpos Antibacterianos , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Difteria/prevenção & controle , Vacina contra Difteria, Tétano e Coqueluche/efeitos adversos , Vacinas contra Difteria, Tétano e Coqueluche Acelular/efeitos adversos , Humanos , Imunização Secundária , Lactente , Federação Russa , Coqueluche/prevenção & controle
5.
Lancet Infect Dis ; 19(9): 988-1000, 2019 09.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31399377

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The adjuvanted recombinant zoster vaccine (Shingrix) can prevent herpes zoster in older adults and autologous haemopoietic stem cell transplant recipients. We evaluated the safety and immunogenicity of this vaccine in adults with haematological malignancies receiving immunosuppressive cancer treatments. METHODS: In this phase 3, randomised, observer-blind, placebo-controlled study, done at 77 centres worldwide, we randomly assigned (1:1) patients with haematological malignancies aged 18 years and older to receive two doses of the adjuvanted recombinant zoster vaccine or placebo 1-2 months apart during or after immunosuppressive cancer treatments, and stratified participants according to their underlying diseases. The co-primary objectives of the study were the evaluation of safety and reactogenicity of the adjuvanted recombinant zoster vaccine compared with placebo from the first vaccination up to 30 days after last vaccination in all participants; evaluation of the proportion of participants with a vaccine response in terms of anti-glycoprotein E humoral immune response to the adjuvanted recombinant zoster vaccine at month 2 in all participants, excluding those with non-Hodgkin B-cell lymphoma and chronic lymphocytic leukaemia; and evaluation of the anti-glycoprotein E humoral immune responses to the vaccine compared with placebo at month 2 in all participants, excluding those with non-Hodgkin B-cell lymphoma and chronic lymphocytic leukaemia. We assessed immunogenicity in the per-protocol cohort for immunogenicity and safety in the total vaccinated cohort. The study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01767467, and with the EU Clinical Trials Register, number 2012-003438-18. FINDINGS: Between March 1, 2013, and Sept 10, 2015, we randomly assigned 286 participants to adjuvanted recombinant zoster vaccine and 283 to placebo. 283 in the vaccine group and 279 in the placebo group were vaccinated. At month 2, 119 (80·4%, 95% CI 73·1-86·5) of 148 participants had a humoral vaccine response to adjuvanted recombinant zoster vaccine, compared with one (0·8%, 0·0-4·2) of 130 participants in the placebo group, and the adjusted geometric mean anti-glycoprotein E antibody concentration was 23 132·9 mIU/mL (95% CI 16 642·8-32 153·9) in the vaccine group and 777·6 mIU/mL (702·8-860·3) in the placebo group (adjusted geometric mean ratio 29·75, 21·09-41·96; p<0·0001) in all patients, excluding those with non-Hodgkin B-cell lymphoma and chronic lymphocytic leukaemia. Humoral and cell-mediated immune responses persisted above baseline until month 13 in all strata and, as expected, vaccine was more reactogenic than placebo (within 7 days after vaccination pain was reported by 221 [79·5%] of 278 vaccine group participants and 45 [16·4%] of 274 placebo group participants; fatigue was reported by 162 [58·3%] of 278 vaccine group participants and 102 [37·2%] of 274 placebo group participants). Incidences of unsolicited or serious adverse events, potential immune-mediated diseases, disease-related events, and fatal serious adverse events were similar between the groups. INTERPRETATION: The immunocompromised adult population with haematological malignancies is at high risk for herpes zoster. The adjuvanted recombinant zoster vaccine, which is currently licensed in certain countries for adults aged 50 years and older, is likely to benefit this population. FUNDING: GlaxoSmithKline Biologicals SA.


Assuntos
Anticorpos Antivirais/sangue , Neoplasias Hematológicas/tratamento farmacológico , Vacina contra Herpes Zoster/efeitos adversos , Vacina contra Herpes Zoster/imunologia , Herpesvirus Humano 3/imunologia , Proteínas do Envelope Viral/imunologia , Adolescente , Adulto , Antineoplásicos/imunologia , Contagem de Linfócito CD4 , Fadiga/induzido quimicamente , Feminino , Humanos , Imunidade Celular , Hospedeiro Imunocomprometido/imunologia , Reação no Local da Injeção/etiologia , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Método Simples-Cego , Vacinas Sintéticas/efeitos adversos , Vacinas Sintéticas/imunologia , Adulto Jovem
6.
Hum Vaccin Immunother ; 15(12): 2865-2872, 2019.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31216205

RESUMO

In two pivotal efficacy studies (ZOE-50; ZOE-70), the adjuvanted recombinant zoster vaccine (RZV) demonstrated >90% efficacy against herpes zoster (HZ).Adults aged ≥50 or ≥70 years (ZOE-50 [NCT01165177]; ZOE-70 [NCT01165229]) were randomized to receive 2 doses of RZV or placebo 2 months apart. Vaccine efficacy and safety were evaluated post-hoc in the pooled (ZOE-50/70) population according to the number and type of selected medical conditions present at enrollment.At enrollment, 82.3% of RZV and 82.7% of placebo recipients reported ≥1 of the 15 selected medical conditions. Efficacy against HZ ranged from 84.5% (95% Confidence Interval [CI]: 46.4-97.1) in participants with respiratory disorders to 97.0% (95%CI: 82.3-99.9) in those with coronary heart disease. Moreover, efficacy remained >90% irrespective of the number of selected medical conditions reported by a participant.As indicated by the similarity of the point estimates, this post-hoc analysis suggests that RZV efficacy remains high in all selected medical conditions, as well as with increasing number of medical conditions. No safety concern was identified by the type or number of medical conditions present at enrollment.


Assuntos
Vacina contra Herpes Zoster/administração & dosagem , Vacina contra Herpes Zoster/imunologia , Herpes Zoster/prevenção & controle , Neuralgia Pós-Herpética/prevenção & controle , Potência de Vacina , Adjuvantes Imunológicos/administração & dosagem , Idoso , Doença Crônica , Comorbidade , Interpretação Estatística de Dados , Feminino , Humanos , Hospedeiro Imunocomprometido , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Neuralgia Pós-Herpética/imunologia , Fatores de Risco , Vacinação , Vacinas Sintéticas/imunologia
7.
J Infect Dis ; 217(11): 1750-1760, 2018 05 05.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29529222

RESUMO

Background: The herpes zoster subunit vaccine (HZ/su), consisting of varicella-zoster virus glycoprotein E (gE) and AS01B Adjuvant System, was highly efficacious in preventing herpes zoster in the ZOE-50 and ZOE-70 trials. We present immunogenicity results from those trials. Methods: Participants (ZOE-50: ≥50; ZOE-70: ≥70 years of age) received 2 doses of HZ/su or placebo, 2 months apart. Serum anti-gE antibodies and CD4 T cells expressing ≥2 of 4 activation markers assessed (CD42+) after stimulation with gE-peptides were measured in subcohorts for humoral (n = 3293) and cell-mediated (n = 466) immunogenicity. Results: After vaccination, 97.8% of HZ/su and 2.0% of placebo recipients showed a humoral response. Geometric mean anti-gE antibody concentrations increased 39.1-fold and 8.3-fold over baseline in HZ/su recipients at 1 and 36 months post-dose 2, respectively. A gE-specific CD42+ T-cell response was shown in 93.3% of HZ/su and 0% of placebo recipients. Median CD42+ T-cell frequencies increased 24.6-fold (1 month) and 7.9-fold (36 months) over baseline in HZ/su recipients and remained ≥5.6-fold above baseline in all age groups at 36 months. The proportion of CD4 T cells expressing all 4 activation markers increased over time in all age groups. Conclusions: Most HZ/su recipients developed robust immune responses persisting for 3 years following vaccination. Clinical Trials Registration: NCT01165177; NCT01165229.


Assuntos
Vacina contra Herpes Zoster/imunologia , Herpes Zoster/imunologia , Herpesvirus Humano 3/imunologia , Imunidade Celular/imunologia , Imunidade Humoral/imunologia , Adjuvantes Imunológicos/farmacologia , Idoso , Anticorpos Antivirais/imunologia , Linfócitos T CD4-Positivos , Feminino , Humanos , Imunogenicidade da Vacina/imunologia , Lipídeo A/análogos & derivados , Lipídeo A/farmacologia , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Saponinas/farmacologia , Vacinação/métodos , Vacinas de Subunidades/imunologia , Proteínas do Envelope Viral/imunologia
8.
J Infect Dis ; 216(11): 1352-1361, 2017 12 12.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29029224

RESUMO

Background: The immunogenicity and safety of an adjuvanted herpes zoster subunit (HZ/su) vaccine when coadministered with a quadrivalent seasonal inactivated influenza vaccine (IIV4) was investigated in a phase 3, open-label, randomized clinical trial in adults aged ≥50 years. Methods: Subjects were randomized 1:1 to receive either HZ/su (varicella zoster virus glycoprotein E; AS01B Adjuvant System) and IIV4 at day 0 followed by a second HZ/su dose at month 2 (coadministration group), or IIV4 at month 0 and HZ/su at months 2 and 4 (control group). The primary objectives were the HZ/su vaccine response rate in the coadministration group and the noninferiority of the antibody responses to HZ/su and IIV4 in the coadministration compared with the control group. Safety information was collected throughout the duration of the study. Results: A total of 413 subjects were vaccinated in the coadministration group and 415 in the control group. The HZ/su vaccine response rate in the coadministration group was 95.8% (95% confidence interval, 93.3%-97.6%) and the anti-glycoprotein E GMCControl/Coadmin ratio was 1.08 (.97-1.20). The primary noninferiority objectives were met. No safety concerns were observed. Conclusions: No interference in the immune responses to either vaccine was observed when the vaccines were coadministered, and no safety concerns were identified. Clinical Trials Registration: NCT01954251.


Assuntos
Adjuvantes Imunológicos/farmacologia , Vacina contra Herpes Zoster/imunologia , Herpes Zoster/imunologia , Herpes Zoster/prevenção & controle , Imunogenicidade da Vacina/imunologia , Vacinas contra Influenza/imunologia , Vacinas de Subunidades/imunologia , Adjuvantes Imunológicos/administração & dosagem , Adjuvantes Imunológicos/efeitos adversos , Adjuvantes Farmacêuticos/administração & dosagem , Adjuvantes Farmacêuticos/farmacologia , Idoso , Anticorpos Antivirais/sangue , Anticorpos Antivirais/imunologia , Formação de Anticorpos/imunologia , Combinação de Medicamentos , Efeitos Colaterais e Reações Adversas Relacionados a Medicamentos/epidemiologia , Feminino , Vacina contra Herpes Zoster/efeitos adversos , Herpesvirus Humano 3/imunologia , Humanos , Imunidade Celular , Imunidade Humoral , Vacinas contra Influenza/administração & dosagem , Influenza Humana/tratamento farmacológico , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estações do Ano , Vacinação/métodos , Vacinas de Produtos Inativados , Vacinas de Subunidades/administração & dosagem , Vacinas de Subunidades/efeitos adversos
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...